|
|
Back | Home | Next | |
Regional attribution of a 17th century
|
![]() |
| Figure 1 |
|
Acknowledgement is given to the use of the research methodology recommended by Dr. Bernard (Bill) Cotton in researching Regional Furniture of the late 18th and 19th century traditions.[2] However the subject chest is, if one accepts that the carved date is original, dated to the 17th century. Therefore some of the evidence later utilised for systematic processes of comparison, regrettably did not exist in this earlier period.
The use of documented facts from Census and other records, trade directories and sale catalogues is thwarted for this early period. ‘The lack of printed pattern books as sources until well into the 18th century’[3] also frustrates research. However, comparison of stylistic carved motifs to evidence regional tradition is extremely helpful as a starting point for any research,[4] and recognition must be given to Victor Chinnery’s assistance in his excellent 1980 publication.[5] However, one has to bear in mind that moveable furniture must be authenticated by recourse to the historically convincing comparison of built in furniture in traditional buildings of a region as an invaluable benchmark of known period woodwork. Basic clues as to origin are followed but its attribution is challenged and then investigated in a more simplistic starting manner. This leads to comparison with primary items of known provenance and eventual justification.
The geographical subject area has already been alluded to but just like any research the relevant starting point was with the ‘primary’ subject object, unravelled perhaps like the investigation by a detective from the evidence initially presented. The chest[6] which measures overall 30 inches in height by 46 inches width by 20 inches depth is made of oak. It was offered for auction sale in 1999 at the East Anglian provincial salerooms of Thomas Wm. Gaze & Son,[7] which perhaps could not have been further removed from its ultimate perceived region of origin. The provenance given by the vendor, a known travelling dealer of good local integrity, was that it came from the estate of a deceased school mistress in Oxfordshire. Inside the chest was a reproduction copy of a Map of Oxford dated 1648. (Fig. 2).
![]() |
| Figure 2 |
It was suggested, albeit never catalogued, that the date on the chest of 1683 coincided with the known date of the opening of Britain’s oldest public museum, the Ashmolean at Oxford and the carved dating suggested a tenuous commemoration connection to the University.
However the former information was pure speculation with no research basis and was soon proved to be erroneous. Much more unique and useful information was found written inside the chest in black ink. This purported to give details of the chests’ previous ownership, and is written on either side of the end panels of the brown paper lining. Hand written in script on the left it simply reads, ‘Miss Whiteside Lorton’ (Fig. 3) and on the right in a different hand, ‘from Thomas Johnson Station St Cmouth’ (Fig. 4) and underneath, the inscription, ‘R.S. Whiteside Esq. Lorton’ (Fig. 5). The suggestion was apparent that these were certainly significant as probable former owners of the chest.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Figure 3 | Figure 4 | Figure 5 |
The lining paper has the age and appearance of having been in place since at least the 19th century and the ink used and style of writing further verifies similar age estimation. Cockermouth is situated in West Cumbria on the north west fringe of the Lake District, whilst Lorton and Lorton Vale extend south easterly of this town toward the lakes of Crummock Water and Buttermere. However the written information, whilst giving possibilities of previous owners, does not in itself give indication of regional origin of the piece because it is readily transportable and not fixed furniture. Interest in the district was intensified as a point for further study when a search of Bulmer’s Directory of Cumberland found the record of a ‘Mary Whiteside (Gentlewoman) of Kirkfell Lorton’ and a ‘Thomas E Johnson (Tailor and Draper) of Station Street, Cockermouth’.[8] Furthermore from Principal Inhabitants of Cumberland and Westmorland 1829, it was revealed that a certain ‘John Whiteside’ of ‘Highside, Lorton’ was listed as once residing there.[9]
Construction of the chest is as expected to be found on furniture purporting to date from the 17th century. The front, sides, hinged straight top and back are made with panels, rebated into stiles, muntins and rails. The frame components are fixed together by mortise and tenon joints, stabilised by fixing tapered pegs or ‘dowels’ of initially green wood[10] driven through the joint union (Fig. 6). This type of construction is commonly called ‘joined’ indicating that it was made by a Joiner with knowledge of construction techniques rather than a planked and nailed assembly by a jobbing Carpenter. These chests were made for storage of all manner of items including food[11]and the construction allowed for shrinkage and expansion of timber without splitting.[12]
However the chest does have hand-made nails with crude uneven heads holding a planked base to the under-frame. These planks are affixed front to back, which, as Noel Riley points out, is common to cupboards and chests of the Lake District and Yorkshire [13](Fig. 7). The stiles, rails and muntins on the front and sides are channel moulded. The back stiles and rails are similarly shaped and so are the top rails and muntins. This feature is typical of pieces recorded in the area (See Fig. 6) both by Victor Chinnery.[14] This characteristic was noted by Riley as ‘grooving’ and referenced to the channel moulding noted and quoted by Peter Thornborrow.[15] The chest lid is hinged by forged iron ring and hoop fixings. The fixing ends are crudely driven through the frame and bent over to form a right angle in ‘paper-fastener’ fashion (Fig. 8). It has sadly lost its iron lock, but evidence of three different keyholes on the top frieze is seen on an uncarved rectangular section. Particular attention is drawn to the figure ‘1’of the carved date which has the characteristic stylisation of intertwining seen on many examples from the Lake District. The chip-carved background and deep cutting of the carved decoration to the panels and frieze gives highlights and shade which have also been recorded by Chinnery as distinctive of ‘Lakeland joinery’ (Fig. 9). Noticeable too is the fine patination, apparently achieved, says Chinnery:
by smoky interiors, generations of proud housewives and, as the locals would have it, the occasional applications of a polish compounded from bull’s blood, vinegar and beeswax.[16]
![]() |
Fig. 6
(left). Part of panelled top & pegging |
|
Fig. 7 (right).
Chest underside planking |
![]() |
![]() |
Fig. 8 (left).
Hoop & ring hinges
|
|
Fig. 9 (right).
Key-holes, numbering & patina |
![]() |
The carved detail in Cumbria is more obvious than many parts of the country for elaborate interlace of Celtic knot and strap-work motifs. The survival/revival of Scandinavian decoration from Norse settlers together with the isolation of the Lake District was a determining factor for adoption seen in 17th century carving, fashionable until the mid 18th century.[18] There is further evidence of revival and continuing tradition when one looks at the house at Townend Troutbeck and George Browne’s Victorian improving of plain oak as suggested by Susan Denyer.[19] Consider too, the prolific number of Celtic Crosses in Lakeland cemeteries and the influence on Arts and Crafts style as espoused by John Ruskin (1819-1900).[20]
Comparison was made between the joined armchair (Fig. 10) dated 1662, known at St. Bartholomew’s Church Barbon,[21] near Kirby Lonsdale Cumbria and the State Tester bed (Fig 11) dated 1672 at Townend, Troutbeck[22] in the heart of the Lake District. The left and right panels of the subject chest were compared to the back panel of the chair.
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Figure 10 | Figure 11 |
Although the chest left panel has the flowing appearance of the Celtic Classical Knot, its symmetry is complementary to the chairs’ double interlaced ‘S’ scroll and fern leaf terminals. The fern leaf device is used in a different manner of decoration between the two examples but the overall appearance is extremely similar, particularly the centre knot cross-over. The chests’ right panel is the same decorative device as the chair, but terminates in a six leaf stylistic floral terminal as opposed to fern leaf The basic overall shape of the presented decoration is identical. Further comparison was made to a built in cupboard at Green End Farm Hawkshead, dated 1690 and the upper left bed panel in the Townend bed (Fig. 12). The Hawkshead central cross-over knot is identical to the chests left panel although the centres of the knots feature stylised rosettes, but the balance of design is the same. On the Townend upper left bed panel comparison to the central cross-over of both end panels of the chest are closely comparable.
| Left panel of subject chest dated 1683 | Green End Farm Hawkshead cupboard dated 1692 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
| Townend Troutbeck, top left bed panel of Tester state bed dated 1672. | St Bartholomew's Barbon Church armchair dated 1662 |
| Figure 12 |
Behind the pillow on the bed at Troutbeck and slightly below the level of the linen covering it is to be found another panel (Fig. 13) which uses both the S scrolls and interlace seen in the right and centre panels of the chest (Fig. 14). Closer comparison of the floral designs shows similar six leaf plants placed symmetrically and identically in four positions at the centre of the S scrolls.
![]() |
![]() |
|
| Figure 13 | Figure 14 |
The use of ‘zoomorphic’ detail discussed by Well-Cole[23]and the ‘use of fantastic animal and human details’ by Chinnery[24] open a wonderful insight into the carving detail found on the left panel of this chest (Fig. 15). It can be suggested that Celtic influence came from many sources.
![]() |
| Figure 15 |
The Lindisfarne Gospel cruciform page was cited by Wells-Cole,[25] but an interesting direct local comparison here is indicated in the Royal Commission Historic Monuments, Westmorland Inventory.[26] This shows under the heading ‘Pre-Conquest stones’ a cross shaft recorded at Kirby Stephen Church, Cumbria in 1936 (Fig. 16). The pointed chin, head shape, eyes and nose profile of the carved figure is remarkably similar to the panel form (Fig. 17). Reference is also drawn to the composition of head details in a portrait of St. John from the MacDurnan Gospels, a 9 th. century Celtic manuscript [27](Fig. 18).
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
||
| Figure 16 | Figure 17 | Figure 18 |
The former mentioned inventory notes a number of court cupboards and built in beds which are excellent reference upon which to compare moveable furniture carving styles. At Common Farm, Windermere, two three stage cupboards are illustrated[28] with a provenance that the homestead was that of the Williamson Family, supporters of Society of Friends. The earliest dated 1628 cupboard has an identical fern pattern on the outer doors, whilst the central door has a rose or floral carving and fern all similar to the patterns on the subject chest. Again at Wood Farm Troutbeck a cupboard with identical double interlaced S scrolls is shown.[29] At a yeoman farm dwelling at Fusethwaite Yeat, Windermere another built-in cupboard with initials EE is dated 1683[30] and has identical interlaced S Scrolls and fern carving as the end panels on the subject chest.
The chest is localised as being stylistic in both construction and carved decoration to the indicated fixed cupboard furniture of the Lake District. Although not built-in, the Tester bed of Townend, which from Inventories kept by the National Trust, says curator Margaret Gregg; ‘has been installed at Townend since it was first constructed in 1672 for George and Ellinor Browne’,[31]has also been compared to the well studied chair at Barbon and the subject chest, all being found conclusively stylistically related one to the other.
The possible ownership of the subject chest by the Whiteside family at the turn of the 19th century in Lorton was traced to various locations in that area. Between High Side, a Hamlet and Kirk Fell, at the edge of Lorton Vale a stone-built farmhouse was located in which stood a large free standing court cupboard with a carved frieze and dated 1705. The property’s present owner said, ‘It was too large ever to have been moved from the room’,[32] which is borne out by the only access through a low and narrow latch type panel door. Inscribed on the frieze of the cupboard, next to the date and a stylistic eight petal flower are carved the initials W and M with a further letter W slightly above, between the two. This type of carving, mentioned by Christopher Gilbert as a Brideswain,[33] is possibly the celebration of marriage, with the family name as the central top initial. Chinnery points out ‘they are not always marriage initials, but may represent only the head of the household.’[34] However, what these initials represent as far as has been understood for the last three hundred years is, William and Mary Whiteside who were resident in the early eighteenth century and whose family descendants are known to have resided in the Lorton area until the mid twentieth century!
Postscript.
The rural isolation of the region in the 17th and 18th centuries with just one known main route north/south, its inaccessibility of the pikes, mountains, lakes and fells, in all probability helped maintain the individuality of the traditions from outside influences. The subject chest with its constructional and carved devices is now identified, not only to Lakeland craftsmanship but possibly to its original owner’s locality as well. Beautiful carved oak identified of the region, the cabinets and cupboards, chests and beds themselves possibly previously enclosed within a cabinet of Coleridge’s beauties.
The DaffodilsI
wandered lonely as a cloud
|
Photograph taken by Mike W. Bucknole on 22nd April 2003. |
There is a Yew-tree, pride of Lorton Vale, which to this day stands single, in the midst of its own darkness, as it stood of yore: Not loathe to furnish weapons for the bands of Umfraville or Percy ere they marched to Scotland's heaths; or those that crossed the sea and drew their sounding bows at Azincourt, perhaps at earlier Crecy, or Pointiers. Of vast circumference and gloom profound this solitary Tree! -a living thing produced too slowly ever to decay; of form and aspect too magnificent to be destroyed.
[1] S.T. Coleridge poetry seen in opening chapter of Susan Denyer Traditional Buildings & Life in The Lake District Victor Gollancz, London 1991. p.11.
[2] Bernard D. Cotton, Regional Furniture Studies in the late 18th and 19th century Traditions: An Introduction to Research Methods. Regional Furniture (1987, Vol. 1), pp.1-18.
[3] Anthony Wells-Cole, Oak Furniture from Lancashire & the Lake District Temple Newsam Exhibition Catalogue, 1973. p.v.
[4] Cotton, op. cit. Firstly recording and classifying with the intention of identifying regional furniture in stylistic terms and furthermore establishing specific repertoires of stylistic motifs to evidence regional traditions and variations systematically. Secondly, the use of documentary evidence of social & manufacturing context to exemplify its existence.
[5] Victor Chinnery, Oak Furniture, The British Tradition. (Antique Collectors Club, Woodbridge 1980), pp. 486-493.
[6] ‘.. chest are normally of panelled or boarded construction, raised from the ground on elogated feet and have flat lids of planks or panels….coffers are closely related being wtithout feet….’ Victor Chinnery, Furniture Terminology in post-Medieval Middle–Class Inventories. Regional Furniture 1991, Volume V pp.16-30.
[7] Thomas Wm. Gaze & Son, Diss Auction Rooms, Roydon Road, Diss, Norfolk.
[8] Roland Grig, Bulmers Directory of Cumberland (1901).
[9] Roland Grig, Principal Inhabitants of Cumberland and Westmorland (1829).
[10] Elizabeth Drury (Ed.), Antiques: Traditional Techniques of the Master Craftsmen: Furniture, Glass, Ceramics, Gold, Silver and much more (Macmillan, London 1986), pp.20-21.
[11] Gabriel Olive, ‘West Country Chests, Coffers and Boxes’, Regional Furniture (1990), Vol. IV, p.49.
[12] Anthony Rogers and Fergus Lyons, ‘Furniture, The Age of Oak’, The Regent Academy of Fine Art (London), 1992), p.6.
[13] Noel Riley, ‘A Lake District Cupboard’ Regional Furniture (1999, Vol. XIII), p.55 & Fig. 5, p.57.
[14] Chinnery, op. cit., p.492.
[15] Peter H. Thornborrow, ‘Canopied Cupboards of Aire and Calder Valleys, West Yorkshire’ Regional Furniture (1997, Vol. XI), p.93 & Fig. 21.
[16] Chinnery, op. cit., p. 492.
[17] Wells-Cole, op. cit., p.xii.
[18] H.S. Cowper, Hawkshead (1902), p.299; Wells-Cole, loc. cit., p. xi; also Chinnery, op. cit., p. 489; and Susan Denyer, Traditional Buildings & Life in the Lake District (Gollancz, London 1991), pp. 37-40.
[19] Susan Denyer, op. cit., p. 43.
[20] John Ruskin, most influencial and important Artistic critic of the Victorian era. Supporter of the Pre-Raphaelites, Arts and Crafts Movements, now buried at St. Andrews Church, Coniston and memorial of a large stone Celtic cross with prolific interlaced knot work and other devices.
[21] Wells-Cole, loc. cit., p.x, & p. 15; also Chinnery, op. cit., p. 487, Fig. 4:170a.
[22] Denyer, op. cit., p.50; also ‘Townend Cumbria’ National Trust (2000), pp. 12-13.
[23] Wells-Cole, op. cit., p.x.
[24] Chinnery, op. cit., p.489.
[25] Well-Cole, loc. cit., p. v.
[26] Royal Commission of Historic Monuments,Westmorland Inventory, R.C.H.M. (H.M.S.O., 1936), plate 7.
[27] Ian Zaczek, The Art of the Celts (Parkgate, London 1997) p.76.
[28] R.C.H.M. op. cit., p.32, plate 4.
[29] R.C.H.M. loc. cit., p.120, illustration 2.
[30] loc. cit., plate 40.
[31] Personal communication from Mrs. Margaret Gregg (Curator) Townend, Troutbeck on 21st April 2003.
[32] Personal communication from current property owner (anonymity requested) on 22nd April 2003.
[33] Christopher Gilbert, English Vernacular Furniture 1750-1900. (Yale University Press, New Haven & London, 1991), p.40; also J.C. Atkinson, Forty years in a Moorland Parish (London 1891), p. 210; andA Glossary of Cleveland Dialect (London, 1868). pp. 71-2.
[34] Chinnery, op. cit., p.493.
[35] Mannix & Whellan, History, Gazetteer and Directory of Cumberland, 1847. Lorton, supposed to be a corruption of Lower Town, is a township containing the villages of High and Low Lorton, distant about half a mile from each other, and four miles S. by E. of Cockermouth. Its principal landowners are Jno. Bridges, Esq., Mr. Jno. Jennings, Miss Stubbs, E. C. Knubley, Esq., and Mr. Jno. Pearson, and its rateable value is £2313. 8s. The whole township belongs to the honour of Cockermouth, as a parcel of the manor of Derwent fells except a small customary manor, which belongs to the dean and chapter of Carlisle, to whose court here their tenants in this neighbourhood are amenable. "The customary tenants pay a fourpenny fine upon change of tenant by death; but the lord never dies. And the tenants are entitled to all wood upon their respective customary estates." Hutchinson says, "in the reign of Henry VIII it was held in severalty by three persons, Winder, Sands, and Huddleston; but we do not find how they derived their title." In the village of Low Lorton, on the banks of the river Cocker, stands Lorton Hall, the seat and property of Robert Bridge, Esq., in right of his wife, youngest sister of the late G. L. Bragg, Esq. (Kendal Library Reference Archive, Cumbria)
[36] Born Cockermouth, 7th April 1770, died Rydal Mount, Ambleside 23rd April, 1850. (The Lake District).
Article by Mike W. Bucknole, BA (Hons).
The subject chest is currently on display at the Study
Collection of
Southampton Institute, East Park Terrace, SO14 0YN,
Southampton, U.K.
Copyright 2004. All rights protected.